From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martin Devera <devik(at)cdi(dot)cz> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WAL & SHM principles |
Date: | 2001-03-08 16:45:16 |
Message-ID: | 200103081645.LAA03243@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > > The only problem is that we would no longer have control over which
> > > > pages made it to disk. The OS would perhaps write pages as we modified
> > > > them. Not sure how important that is.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, this alone is a *fatal* objection. See nearby
> > > discussions about WAL behavior: we must be able to control the relative
> > > timing of WAL write/flush and data page writes.
> >
> > Bummer.
> >
> BTW, what means "bummer" ?
Sorry, it means, "Oh, I am disappointed."
> But for many OSes you CAN control when to write data - you can mlock
> individual pages.
mlock() controls locking in physical memory. I don't see it controling
write().
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-08 17:03:33 | Re: Proposed WAL changes |
Previous Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2001-03-08 16:43:16 | Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster |