Re: WAL & SHM principles

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martin Devera <devik(at)cdi(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL & SHM principles
Date: 2001-03-07 16:22:58
Message-ID: 200103071622.LAA09905@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The only problem is that we would no longer have control over which
> > pages made it to disk. The OS would perhaps write pages as we modified
> > them. Not sure how important that is.
>
> Unfortunately, this alone is a *fatal* objection. See nearby
> discussions about WAL behavior: we must be able to control the relative
> timing of WAL write/flush and data page writes.

Bummer.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-03-07 16:57:02 Re: Proposed WAL changes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-07 16:21:37 Re: WAL & SHM principles