Re: pg_dumpall -c (7.1 beta 4 buglet)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)inquent(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall -c (7.1 beta 4 buglet)
Date: 2001-03-07 15:16:41
Message-ID: 200103071516.KAA04464@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Doesn't seem right that the DROP DATABASE comes before the individual
> dropping of indicies, tables, etc. Anyway to reverse this (less
> errors that way).

Can I ask why you would want to use -c with pg_dumpall? Doesn't
pg_dumpall's database creation make the -c option meaningless?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boulat Khakimov 2001-03-07 15:19:44 Re: (blowfish in Postgres) Undefined symbol -- YAY!
Previous Message Lisa Goulet 2001-03-07 14:58:16 Importing data only