Re: CommitDelay performance improvement

From: Dominique Quatravaux <dom(at)idealx(dot)com>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitDelay performance improvement
Date: 2001-02-25 16:27:06
Message-ID: 20010225172706.A26677@singer.ird.idealx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >Basically, I am not sure how much we lose by doing the delay after
> >returning COMMIT, and I know we gain quite a bit by enabling us to group
> >fsync calls.
>
> If included, this should be an option only, and not the default option.

Sure it should never become the default, because the "D" in ACID is just
about forbidding this kind of behaviour...

--
Dominique

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J.H.M. Dassen Ray 2001-02-25 16:29:35 Re: ask for help !!! (emergency case)
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-25 14:25:15 RE: CommitDelay performance improvement