how critical is WAL ?

From: Rini Dutta <rinid(at)rocketmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: how critical is WAL ?
Date: 2001-02-22 14:44:01
Message-ID: 20010222144401.22115.qmail@web2904.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I happenned to come across the following in the
documentation on WAL implementation in v7.1 -

*****************************************************
Before WAL, any crash during writing could result in:

1.index tuples pointing to non-existent table rows

2.index tuples lost in split operations

3.totally corrupted table or index page content,
because of partially written data pages
*****************************************************

Does anybody know what kind of a problem this refers
to ? Does this mean that incomplete transactions would
be stored or does this mean that the entire table
might get corrupted and unusable, implying loss of all
data ?

( I am using postgresql v7.0.x , and would ideally
like to migrate to v7.1 after a few months ... unless
it is critical enough to do so earlier. )

Thanks,
Rini

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paulo Parola 2001-02-22 15:04:11 Location of 7.1 version for download
Previous Message Luis Magaa 2001-02-22 14:33:19 Errors in other languages

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-02-22 15:12:39 RE: beta5 ...
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 2001-02-22 14:40:09 Re: RE: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance