From: | Rini Dutta <rinid(at)rocketmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | how critical is WAL ? |
Date: | 2001-02-22 14:44:01 |
Message-ID: | 20010222144401.22115.qmail@web2904.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I happenned to come across the following in the
documentation on WAL implementation in v7.1 -
*****************************************************
Before WAL, any crash during writing could result in:
1.index tuples pointing to non-existent table rows
2.index tuples lost in split operations
3.totally corrupted table or index page content,
because of partially written data pages
*****************************************************
Does anybody know what kind of a problem this refers
to ? Does this mean that incomplete transactions would
be stored or does this mean that the entire table
might get corrupted and unusable, implying loss of all
data ?
( I am using postgresql v7.0.x , and would ideally
like to migrate to v7.1 after a few months ... unless
it is critical enough to do so earlier. )
Thanks,
Rini
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paulo Parola | 2001-02-22 15:04:11 | Location of 7.1 version for download |
Previous Message | Luis Magaa | 2001-02-22 14:33:19 | Errors in other languages |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-02-22 15:12:39 | RE: beta5 ... |
Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 2001-02-22 14:40:09 | Re: RE: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance |