From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Section numbering |
Date: | 2001-02-19 18:02:32 |
Message-ID: | 200102191802.NAA10972@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Numbers Look good to me.
> Does anyone mind if I turn on section numbering? I.e., instead of
>
> 9. Multi-Version Concurrency Control
> Introduction
> Transaction Isolation
> Read Committed Isolation Level
> Serializable Isolation Level
> Data consistency checks at the application level
> Locking and Tables
> Table-level locks
> Row-level locks
> Locking and Indices
>
> We'd have
>
> 9. Multi-Version Concurrency Control
> 9.1 Introduction
> 9.2 Transaction Isolation
> 9.3 Read Committed Isolation Level
> 9.4 Serializable Isolation Level
> 9.5 Data consistency checks at the application level
> 9.6 Locking and Tables
> 9.6.1 Table-level locks
> 9.6.2 Row-level locks
> 9.7 Locking and Indices
>
> This makes for easier reference, and the cross-reference links look a lot
> less tacky (no longer "see the section called "Locking and Indices").
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-19 18:03:53 | Section numbering |
Previous Message | pblunat | 2001-02-19 17:00:58 | : documentations on plpgsql |