Re: floating point representation

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: floating point representation
Date: 2001-02-19 15:22:57
Message-ID: 200102191522.KAA26517@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > The 7.1-release seems near.
> > May I provide the followings ?
> > SET FLOAT4_PRECISION TO ..
> > SET FLOAT8_PRECISION TO ..
>
> > Or must we postpone to fix it ?
>
> This seems a small enough change that I do not fear fixing it at this
> late date. However, I do not like the idea of making the SET variables
> be just number of digits precision. As long as we're going to have SET
> variables, let's go for the full flexibility offered by sprintf: define
> the SET variables as the sprintf format strings to use. The defaults
> would be "%.7g" and "%.17g" (or thereabouts, not sure what number of
> digits we are currently using). This way, someone could select the C99
> %a format if he knew that his libc supported it. Or he could force a
> particular format like %7.3f if that's what he needed in a specific
> application.

Added to TODO:

* Add SET FLOAT4_PRECISION and SET FLOAT8_PRECISION using printf args

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-19 15:29:52 Re: AW: Re: beta5 ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-02-19 15:08:29 Re: AW: Re: beta5 ...