Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping
Date: 2001-02-17 03:33:03
Message-ID: 200102170333.WAA27042@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> After looking a little more, I think this is too big a change to risk
> making for beta. I was thinking it might be an easy change, but it's
> not; there's noplace to store the open-relation reference if we don't
> have a relcache entry. But we don't want to pay the price of opening a
> relcache entry just to dump some buffers.
>
> I recall Vadim speculating about decoupling the storage manager's notion
> of open files from the relcache, and having a much more lightweight
> open-relation mechanism at the smgr level. That might be a good way
> to tackle this. But I'm not going to touch it for 7.1...

No way to group the writes to you can keep the most recent one open?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-17 03:42:59 Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-17 03:06:28 Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping