From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping |
Date: | 2001-02-17 03:33:03 |
Message-ID: | 200102170333.WAA27042@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> After looking a little more, I think this is too big a change to risk
> making for beta. I was thinking it might be an easy change, but it's
> not; there's noplace to store the open-relation reference if we don't
> have a relcache entry. But we don't want to pay the price of opening a
> relcache entry just to dump some buffers.
>
> I recall Vadim speculating about decoupling the storage manager's notion
> of open files from the relcache, and having a much more lightweight
> open-relation mechanism at the smgr level. That might be a good way
> to tackle this. But I'm not going to touch it for 7.1...
No way to group the writes to you can keep the most recent one open?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-17 03:42:59 | Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-17 03:06:28 | Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping |