Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Date: 2001-02-10 21:38:03
Message-ID: 200102102138.QAA16207@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc pgsql-patches

> > > Hmm, could only you 2 decide it so quickly ?
> > > For whom pgsql ODBC driver is ?
> >
> > I can put it back. You want it back?
> >
>
> Yes.
> ISTM discussion is needed before the change.

OK, let's discuss. Why should ODBC still support 6.3 and 6.2 databases?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2001-02-10 23:15:18 RE: [PATCHES] Fix for ODBC close
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-10 21:36:40 RE: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2001-02-10 22:53:33 Minor ODBC Patch
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-10 21:37:02 RE: 7.1 beta 3 Linux ODBC BEGIN Behaviour

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2001-02-10 22:53:33 Minor ODBC Patch
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-10 21:36:40 RE: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol