From: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Shaw Terwilliger <sterwill(at)sourcegear(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL over NFS? |
Date: | 2001-02-09 23:23:08 |
Message-ID: | 20010209152308.U26076@fw.wintelcom.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
* Shaw Terwilliger <sterwill(at)sourcegear(dot)com> [010209 15:12] wrote:
> I've been using PostgreSQL for a few years now in various projects, and
> I've been very happy with its features and performance.
>
> I have a client who wants to know how PostgreSQL (7) will perform over
> NFS. The NFS client is Solaris, the server is a big network storage
> appliance. The network is probably gigabit ethernet.
>
> My first reaction is to tell them they're just crazy, and that's not how
> a database is intended to work, and they should buy some fast, redundant
> local storage. I thought I'd ask the designers and users here so I could
> back up my recommendations.
NFS == Not F****** Stable, don't do it. :) Any DBA will want to
hurt you when he hears about you running a production DB over NFS.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Wolfe | 2001-02-09 23:27:04 | Re: PostgreSQL over NFS? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-09 23:15:18 | Re: PostgreSQL over NFS? |