Re: Include files for SPI are not installed

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Include files for SPI are not installed
Date: 2001-02-07 00:50:42
Message-ID: 200102070050.TAA24580@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I agree with Karel on this --- it's difficult to visualize doing useful
> SPI work without a source tree at hand, and it also seems unlikely that
> SPI authors would get along for long with *only* those header files
> needed to pull in spi.h. So I think it's pretty pointless to add just
> those header files.
>
> What would make more sense is for the standard install to install only
> those headers needed for *client side* programming, and then to have
> an optional install target that installs the whole darn src/include
> tree. (Or in RPM terms, a client-devel RPM and a separate server-devel
> RPM that adds the rest of src/include.) Anything in between is
> guaranteed to be the wrong set of files.

Agreed. I hesitate to copy all those *.h files when few people use them.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-07 00:51:06 Re: OID from insert has extra letter
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-07 00:46:44 Re: Duplicate OIDs in pg_attribute