From: | m w <mttf2000(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Can we modify 'text *' passed to a C function? |
Date: | 2001-02-05 20:13:56 |
Message-ID: | 20010205201356.42365.qmail@web12405.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
If I write a function that does a 'tolower()' on each
character of a parameter passed into my function, do I
have to allocate a new text object and initialize it
and copy the data, or can I modify that object in
place and return it?
Modifying it in place will save the overhead of an
alloc call, and on a large database, that could add
up.
right now, I am allocating a new data buffer of
exactly the same size and it seems like a waste.
Secondly, if I modify the data length of an object,
as: VARDATA(field) = nn, making sure that 'nn' is
smaller than the origial length, with this affect the
memory management?
In short, can we modify text * objects passed to a C
function, and can we shrink the length field without
any ill effects?
(Doing so will reduce quite a bit of memory allocation
overhead I am doing.)
__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-05 20:26:23 | Re: pg_ctl wish list |
Previous Message | Mathieu Dube | 2001-02-05 20:12:23 | with -g and libpq.a ... |