From: | Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: php as stored procedures |
Date: | 2001-02-01 07:18:15 |
Message-ID: | 20010131231815.A3090@newsnipple.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 07:34:51PM -0500, Brett W. McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Dan Wilson wrote:
>
> > I wouldn't call PHP a subset of Perl at all! I'd call them sibling
> > languages with different strengths. I think Perl does certain things better
> > than PHP but PHP has strengths that Perl probably can't compete with. But
> > for the most part, AFAIK, anything you can do in Perl, you can also do in
> > PHP.
>
> Err... I would say it's more the other way around... anything you can do
> in PHP you can do in Perl.
Well, they are both turing complete and extensible enough to be able
to execute arbitrary functions via plug-ins. I studied computer engineering
and not computer science, but I'm pretty sure this makes them functionally
equivalent, so you are both right.
--
Adam Haberlach |A cat spends her life conflicted between a
adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com |deep, passionate, and profound desire for
http://www.newsnipple.com |fish and an equally deep, passionate, and
'88 EX500 |profound desire to avoid getting wet.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Keith C. Perry | 2001-02-01 07:23:08 | Re: How do I list all tables? |
Previous Message | Denis A. Doroshenko | 2001-02-01 07:10:25 | Re: php as stored procedures |