From: | "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone |
Date: | 2001-01-29 06:29:17 |
Message-ID: | 200101290629.f0T6THF27855@linda.lfix.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Just out of curiosity, does Debian enforce a nonstandard location for
>X sockets as well?
X has a big exception made for it in the FHS for /usr/X11R6; I don't see
any mention of how /tmp/.X11/ is to be treated, but X isn't my problem!
I suspect no-one has ever thought to ask the question! You may be
pleased to know that I have now stirred the coals and asked that
question, which applies not only to X but also to several other programs
that I have running.
It seems to me that the main reason for the problem is the need to
cater for non-root installs. I would really like to know what
proportion of total PostgreSQL installs they now are. We are
a long way now from the days when Postgres was a research database with
a poor reputation for reliability. It is now becoming a serious
competitor to major commercial databases and will in many cases be
used as a major application on the machines where it is installed.
Are there still people who can only install PostgreSQL as a private
application?
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"My son, if sinners entice thee, consent thou not."
Proverbs 1:10
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-01-29 06:30:35 | Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-29 05:57:02 | Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone |