Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available .

Did we decide against LAZY? Seems we have a number of people concerned
about vacuum downtime, and I can see this as a win for them. If they
don't specify LAZY, the code is not run.

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > should be easily testable though, no?
>
> What makes you think that?
>
> > worst case, we pull it out afterwards ...
>
> No, worst case is that we release a seriously broken 7.1, and don't
> find out till afterwards.
>
> There are plenty of new features on my to-do list, if beta no longer
> means anything...
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026