Re: no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: aoki(at)acm(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?
Date: 2001-01-24 14:22:53
Message-ID: 200101241422.JAA15335@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-jdbc


Anyone able to fix this?

> Paul M. Aoki (aoki(at)acm(dot)org) reports a bug with a severity of 3
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description no way in LargeObject API to detect short
> read?
>
> Long Description
> org.postgresql.largeobject.LargeObject.read(byte[],int,int)
> returns void instead of int. there's therefore no reliable,
> non-exceptional way to detect short reads.
>
> the natural way to write blocked-read loops would be to assume
> that read(byte[],int,int) returned the number of bytes read or
> (e.g.) -1 on EOF.
>
> Sample Code
>
>
> No file was uploaded with this report
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-24 14:34:37 Re: [BUGS] select cash_out('2'); crashes backend on 7.0.2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-24 14:19:43 Re: JDBC buggy in 7.1beta3

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mirko Zeibig 2001-01-24 14:43:38 JDBC: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 256
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-24 14:20:40 Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc Makefile