Re: docs: syntax.sgml patch

Robert, this in all in CVS, right?

> Woops. syntax.sgml.patch.5 is attached. Don't use syntax.sgml.patch.4, it
> has a mistake in it. Sorry. (Hopefully no other errors!)
>
>
>
> On Sunday 21 January 2001 17:14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I've checked this in, or at least I used it as the starting point for what
> > I did. The GROUP BY and ORDER BY explanations seemed really complicated,
> > so I disabled them for now. They need to be made simpler, and an example
> > would be nice. Essentially, this section is now the description of the
> > SELECT command; maybe it should be named like that, too.
> >
> > Robert B. Easter writes:
> > > I worked on the ORDER BY paragraphs some more. See what you think of it
> > > now. The patch is attached. :)
> > >
> > > On Thursday 18 January 2001 18:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > > > I know this SQL Guide has been discussed, but what should be done
> > > > > with this patch?
> > > >
> > > > I believe he's going to revise it to address Tom Lane's suggestions.
>
> --
> -------- Robert B. Easter reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com ---------
> -- CompTechNews Message Board http://www.comptechnews.com/ --
> -- CompTechServ Tech Services http://www.comptechserv.com/ --
> ---------- http://www.comptechnews.com/~reaster/ ------------

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026