From: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Does Oracle store values in indices? |
Date: | 2001-01-23 19:38:29 |
Message-ID: | 20010123113829.X26076@fw.wintelcom.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> [010123 11:17] wrote:
> [ Charset KOI8-R unsupported, converting... ]
> > > > > The reason you have to visit the main table is that tuple validity
> > > > > status is only stored in the main table, not in each index.
> > > > > See prior discussions in the archives.
> > > >
> > > > But how Oracle handles this?
> > >
> > > Oracle doesn't have non-overwriting storage manager but uses
> > > rollback segments to maintain MVCC. Rollback segments are used
> > > to restore valid version of entire index/table page.
> >
> > Are there any plans to have something like this? I mean overwriting storage
> > manager.
>
> We hope to have it some day, hopefully soon.
Vadim says that he hopes it to be done by 7.2, so if things go
well it shouldn't be that far off...
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | dom | 2001-01-23 19:45:54 | Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-01-23 19:18:00 | Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) |