From: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sinuhi Arroyo <sinuheag(at)isoco(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: select within a fucntion |
Date: | 2001-01-19 19:47:59 |
Message-ID: | 200101191947.OAA07997@jupiter.jw.home |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sinuhi Arroyo wrote:
> I`mtrying to make a select which envolves two tables with in a
> function....if the query is written this way: (this is just an example,
> not my query)
>
> a := (select count(*) from xx);
>
> it works fine, but if I type the query like this
>
> select count(*) from xx;
>
> it throws a message that says unexpected query in exec_stmt_execsql.
> If anyone knows how to fix it, it woul be great.
> Thanx
What should this "select count(*) from xx;" be good for, if
you don't want to use the result? You can of course do
"perform select ..." because that'd use another PL/pgSQL
executor construct that doesn't complain about getting an
unused return value, but I still wonder why you want to waste
CPU and IO (bought an oversized system?).
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-19 19:50:02 | Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-01-19 19:37:32 | Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX |