Re: pg_log

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_log
Date: 2001-01-17 03:53:04
Message-ID: 200101170353.WAA20015@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > In 7.1 it'll have a numeric filename ($PGDATA/global/1269, actually)
> > which should reduce the tendency for DBAs to assume there's nothing
> > important in it. I regard this as one of the major advantages of
> > having switched to numeric filenames ;-)
> >
> What are the others? Is the point of moving to numeric filenames to
> discourage people mucking with the files? With the current system for
> example if a backend coredumps I know to look for it in the directory of
> the database. But how will I know what that is in the future?

I am planning to write a utility to map file name/number to database
objects, hopefully for 7.1.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

  • Re: pg_log at 2001-01-17 03:24:44 from Joseph Shraibman

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Miller 2001-01-17 03:55:20 Permissions
Previous Message Mike Miller 2001-01-17 03:52:06 Re: >>>>> pg_dump in crontab