| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DeadLockCheck is buggy |
| Date: | 2001-01-17 00:34:02 |
| Message-ID: | 200101170034.TAA13548@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I have been studying DeadLockCheck for most of a day now, and I doubt
> that this is the only bug lurking in it. I think that we really ought
> to throw it away and start over, because it doesn't look to me at all
> like a standard deadlock-detection algorithm. The standard way of doing
Go ahead. Throw away my code. *sniff* :-)
No really, feel free to rip it out and start over. It caught most
cases, and I was glad it worked at all, seeing I had never done deadlock
detection before, nor read anything about it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rehak Tamas | 2001-01-17 00:40:58 | Re: copy from stdin; bug? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-17 00:09:42 | Re: CASE inet << inet ... |