Re: $PGDATA/base/???

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: bpalmer <bpalmer(at)crimelabs(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: $PGDATA/base/???
Date: 2001-01-15 21:55:51
Message-ID: 200101152155.QAA04021@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Is there a way to relate this to the names of the databases? Why the
> > change? Or am I missing something key here..
>
> See the thread on the renaming in the archives. In short, this is part
> of Vadim's work on WAL -- the new naming makes certain things easier for
> WAL.
>
> Utilities to relate the new names to the actual database/table names
> _do_ need to be written, however. The information exists in one of the
> system catalogs now -- it just has to be made accessible.

Yes, I am hoping to write this utility before 7.1 final. Maybe it will
have to be in /contrib.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-01-15 22:02:54 Re: RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded.
Previous Message Helge Haugland 2001-01-15 21:35:46 Perl5 confusions