From: | ncm(at)zembu(dot)com (Nathan Myers) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CRCs |
Date: | 2001-01-13 09:36:47 |
Message-ID: | 20010113013647.A7991@store.zembu.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:30:30PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> AFAICS, disk-block CRCs do not guard against mishaps involving intended
> >> writes. They will help guard against data corruption that might creep
> >> in due to outside factors, however.
>
> > Right.
>
> Given that we seem to have agreed on that, I withdraw my complaint about
> disk-block-CRC not being in there for 7.1. I think we are still a ways
> away from the point where externally-induced corruption is a major share
> of our failure rate ;-). 7.2 or so will be time enough to add this
> feature, and I'd really rather not force another initdb for 7.1.
More to the point, putting CRCs on data blocks might have unintended
consequences for dump or vacuum processes. 7.1 is a monumental
accomplishment even without corruption detection, and the sooner
the world has it, the better.
Nathan Myers
ncm(at)zembu(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Myers | 2001-01-13 10:47:53 | Re: CRCs |
Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 2001-01-13 08:45:14 | Out of town these long weekends... |