From: | "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Rajit Singh <singh(dot)raj(at)studychoice(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: timestamp update field across multiple tables |
Date: | 2001-01-12 10:56:43 |
Message-ID: | 200101121056.f0CAuhN30208@linda.lfix.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Rajit Singh wrote:
>I have five tables which are really intended to be one big table, but has be
>en adapted to comply with Postgres's (irritating) 8kb tuple size limit (
>ver 7.0.3).
>
>I have 'modtime' fields in each of these tables which record the last time a
> record was updated. But I would like the behaviour to be such that a m
>odtime field in each of these associated tables is updated when any of t
>he tables are updated. And I would like all of the modtime fields to ta
>ke the same value if possible.
If the rows in these five tables are meant to be all one, why have five
separate modtime fields? That breaks the "rules" against redundant data.
Just have it in one table and put triggers to set it in all five.
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"For the LORD is good; his mercy is everlasting; and
his truth endureth to all generations."
Psalms 100:5
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Huddleston | 2001-01-12 11:45:35 | Re: NT + cygipc + postgresql = boom! |
Previous Message | Rajit Singh | 2001-01-12 10:40:03 | timestamp update field across multiple tables |