Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

From: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Date: 2000-12-27 05:28:49
Message-ID: 20001227002849.A858@rcfile.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On 26 Dec 2000 at 23:41 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote:
| Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
| > | Please apply it locally and let me know what you find.
|
| > what I'm seeing now is much the same.

sorry, I sent the previous email w/o the details of the different
behavior. Inside ExecEvalFieldSelect(), result is now 303, instead
of 110599844 (...or whatever is was). I'm not sure if this gives
you any additional clues.

thanks.
brent

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-12-27 05:56:26 PHP and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-27 04:41:20 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brent Verner 2000-12-27 09:06:11 Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Previous Message oj 2000-12-27 04:49:59 Re: sql -> xls or dbf