From: | Mirko Zeibig <mirko(at)picard(dot)inka(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Best way to replicate a DB between two servers (master/slave) |
Date: | 2000-12-20 23:18:14 |
Message-ID: | 20001221001813.A2607@picard.inka.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello everybody,
I know there was an announcement on www.postgresql.com, that sometime in the
future there will be a sort of replication mechanism for PostgreSQL.
Now the problem:
I have two servers, one providing content for a website (using PHP),
anotherone where users are editing the contents. I now have to update the
content-server on a regular base with the changes made in the
editing-server. I thought of dumping the whole database through ssh to a new
database on the content-server, then drop the old one and rename the new one.
I guess the content to sth. around 5MB, so having a 5Mbit leased line,
network traffic should be no problem.
I see I will run into problems, when an old postgres-process is still
connected to the database. Alternatively I thought of creating a
modification timestamp for every recordset involved and pumping only the
modificated sets to the content-server. I already have triggers running for
providing information about updated/inserted recordsets. But what about
deleted ones? I guess best would be to collect information about these in a
seperate table and delete the ones on the content-server based on this table.
Does anyone know of a more sensible way to get replication?
Best Regards
Mirko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sandeep Joshi | 2000-12-20 23:46:36 | Re: Best way to replicate a DB between two servers (master/slave) |
Previous Message | Poul L. Christiansen | 2000-12-20 22:25:59 | Re: Off topic? - Solution for a delimiter problem |