Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: kislo(at)athenium(dot)com, Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>, igorr(at)ifi(dot)uio(dot)no, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre
Date: 2000-12-12 02:03:45
Message-ID: 200012120203.VAA18180@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> This is a misunderstanding. You can still use the old-style large
> objects (in fact 7.1 has an improved implementation of them too),
> and there's always been support for either over-the-wire or
> server-filesystem read and write of large objects. In fact the former
> is the preferred way; the latter is deprecated because of security
> issues. In a standard installation you can't do the server-filesystem
> bit at all unless you are superuser.

I know we haven't talked about the TOAST/binary interface, but one idea
I had was to load the binary into the large object interface, then
automatically somehow transfer it to the TOAST column. Same for
extracting large objects.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Soma Interesting 2000-12-12 02:43:55 help with referential integrity
Previous Message Sandeep Joshi 2000-12-12 01:51:28 Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre