| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | kislo(at)athenium(dot)com, Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>, igorr(at)ifi(dot)uio(dot)no, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre |
| Date: | 2000-12-12 02:03:45 |
| Message-ID: | 200012120203.VAA18180@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> This is a misunderstanding. You can still use the old-style large
> objects (in fact 7.1 has an improved implementation of them too),
> and there's always been support for either over-the-wire or
> server-filesystem read and write of large objects. In fact the former
> is the preferred way; the latter is deprecated because of security
> issues. In a standard installation you can't do the server-filesystem
> bit at all unless you are superuser.
I know we haven't talked about the TOAST/binary interface, but one idea
I had was to load the binary into the large object interface, then
automatically somehow transfer it to the TOAST column. Same for
extracting large objects.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Soma Interesting | 2000-12-12 02:43:55 | help with referential integrity |
| Previous Message | Sandeep Joshi | 2000-12-12 01:51:28 | Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre |