Re: Memory Usage

From: Andrew Nosenko <awn(at)bcs(dot)zp(dot)ua>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Memory Usage
Date: 2000-12-11 17:12:11
Message-ID: 20001211191211.A21102@bcs.zp.ua
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
: Nathan Barnett <nbarnett(at)centuries(dot)com> writes:
: > UPDATE pages SET createdtime = NOW();
:
: > Is there a reason why this would take up all of the memory??
:
: The now() function invocation leaks memory ... only a dozen or so bytes
: per invocation, but that adds up over millions of rows :-(. In 7.0.*
: the memory isn't recovered until end of statement. 7.1 fixes this by
: recovering temporary memory after each tuple.

As I can see this is not that simple :-(
On UPDATE -- maybe, but not on SELECT.

When SELECT is executing Postgres (7.0.3) allocate how many memory as
need for store full result set of query. On
select * from some_big_table;
this can be in some times more than "physical memory + swap" exist. :-(

In general case I can't disable executing of this (and similar) queries
for users.

Question: Can I say postmaster (or postgres backend) don't use more than
some number of memory (in per-backend basis or for all running backends
totally -- no difference) and when this limit will be exceed -- switch
to using temporary files or simple rollback transaction and close
connection if using temporary files is impossible? (Yes, I mean what
bring down one postrgres process is more cheap that bring down or hang
up all machine.)

Any ideas/workarounds?

--
Andrew W. Nosenko (awn(at)bcs(dot)zp(dot)ua)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Hallstrom 2000-12-11 17:16:25 Article in "Web Techniques" (Jan-2001)...
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-12-11 16:50:56 RE: Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL ?