Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available.

* The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> [001211 14:27] wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> > > > Basically Vadim left it up to me to campaign for acceptance of this
> > > > work and he said he wouldn't have a problem bringing it in as long
> > > > as it was ok with the rest of the development team.
> > > > So can we get a go-ahead on this? :)
> > >
> > > If Vadim isn't sufficiently confident of it to commit it on his own
> > > authority, I'm inclined to leave it out of 7.1. My concern is mostly
> > > schedule. We are well into beta cycle now and this seems like way too
> > > critical (not to say high-risk) a feature to be adding after start of
> > > beta.
> >
> > I was wondering if Vadim was hesitant because he had done this under
> > contract. Vadim, are you concerned about reliability or are there other
> > issues?
>
> Irrelevant .. we are post-beta release, and this doesn't fix a bug, so it
> doesn't go in ...

I'm hoping this just means it won't be investigated until the release
is made?

--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."