| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal |
| Date: | 2000-12-10 23:48:22 |
| Message-ID: | 200012102348.SAA10362@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I will not complain about sticking a "version 1.0" field into a format
> when there is no real intention of changing it in the future ... but
> assigning deep significance to major/minor numbers, or something like
I assume the version would be the COPY format version, not the
PostgreSQL version.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-12-10 23:50:23 | Re: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-10 22:34:27 | Re: COPY BINARY is broken... |