From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: COPY BINARY is broken... |
Date: | 2000-12-10 20:52:16 |
Message-ID: | 200012102052.PAA03438@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Its handling of nulls is bizarre, too. I'm thinking this might be a
> > good time to abandon backwards compatibility and switch to a format
> > that's a little easier to read and write. Does anyone have an opinion
> > pro or con about that?
>
> BINARY COPY scared the bejeezus out of me, anyone using the interface
> is asking for trouble and supporting it seems like a nightmare, I
> would rip it out.
Tom, just keep in mind that the format is documented in copy.sgml.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mlw | 2000-12-10 21:31:20 | Functions returning sets, last one I promise! |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-12-10 20:34:22 | Re: memory management suggestion |