Re: Re: CRC

From: ncm(at)zembu(dot)com (Nathan Myers)
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: CRC
Date: 2000-12-08 21:00:27
Message-ID: 20001208130027.A22256@store.zembu.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:10:19AM -0800, I wrote:
> Current evidence suggests that MD4 would be a good choice for a hash
> algorithm.

Thinking about it, I suspect that any CRC implementation that can't outrun
MD5 by a wide margin is seriously sub-optimal. Can you post any more
details about how the tests were run? I'd like to try it.

Nathan Myers
ncm(at)zembu(dot)com

In response to

  • Re: CRC at 2000-12-08 19:10:19 from Nathan Myers

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-08 21:07:21 Hash index on macaddr -> crash
Previous Message Bruce Guenter 2000-12-08 20:54:30 Re: Re: CRC