From: | Bruno Dickhoff <bruno(at)dickhoff(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | matt(at)designscape(dot)com(dot)au |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re[2]: [Please vote for postgresql!!!] |
Date: | 2000-12-04 09:53:37 |
Message-ID: | 200012040953.KAA22268@post.webmailer.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Matt,
here's some additional information about this issue, as quoted on the "recent news" of www.mycgiserver.com:
"2000-12-04 07:56:51 CET
As some people contacted us what was going on with the current survey (the PostgreSQL vote significantly decreased from one second to another), we'd like to inform you, that, after some additional research, this correction from our side turned out to be unjustified.
The decrease was initially done because of a suspicion of mass-voting for the item in question. However, the tremendious vote increase for PostgreSQL was caused by a group of PostgreSQL supporters rather than abusive behavior."
> We just saw an interesting event... we took it upon ourselves to
> frequently check the current tally by writing a shell script to
> "fetch" it at 30 second intervals...
> !531 marauder(at)bofh:~$ florida
> 1<nobr><b>1496
> 2<nobr><b>1497
> 3<nobr><b>1498
> 4<nobr><b>1499
> 5<nobr><b>1501
> 6<nobr><b>1502
> 7<nobr><b>454
> 8<nobr><b>455
> 9<nobr><b>456
> The sneaky bastards tampered with the voting tallies!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin A. Marques | 2000-12-04 11:35:24 | Re: postgres blobs and PHP |
Previous Message | Bruno Dickhoff | 2000-12-04 09:50:14 | Re: Re[2]: [Please vote for postgresql!!!] |