From: | GH <grasshacker(at)over-yonder(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Your RDBMS Survey ... |
Date: | 2000-12-04 05:06:20 |
Message-ID: | 20001203230620.B75040@over-yonder.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:31:06AM -0400, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
>
> A couple of days ago, one of our brethren noticed and pointed us to your
> survey asking which RDBMS we prefered/were using ... pride in our choice
> prompted alot of us to pop over to your site and register our vote
> ... when I put mine in, the results were at something like 1461 for PgSQL
> and now they are down to 510 ...
\begin{Devils Advocate}
Maybe they are attempting to compensate for a spike in the number of
votes in favor of Postgres. Was there a group of votes from a single ip
or some such?
\end{Devils Advoate}
do
{
sleep();
} while(tired())
gh
>
> one of our brethren has seen it be reset back to 450 at least twice so far
> ...
>
> I'm curious ... is this survey supposed to have any accuracy to it, or are
> the results fixed? *raised eyebrow*
>
> Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Wilson | 2000-12-04 07:56:56 | Re: Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [SQL] a script that queries database periodically |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-12-04 04:31:06 | Your RDBMS Survey ... |