Re: Re[2]: [Please vote for postgresql!!!]

From: GH <grasshacker(at)over-yonder(dot)net>
To:
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Please vote for postgresql!!!]
Date: 2000-12-03 23:40:24
Message-ID: 20001203174024.A74174@over-yonder.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 04:14:48PM -0600, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> looks like it backfired...they've reset the graph

Sheesh! Apparently *everybody* wants a recount.

gh

>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruno Dickhoff
> > Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 3:11 PM
> > To: Bill Barnes
> > Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re[2]: [[GENERAL] Please vote for postgresql!!!]
> >
> >
> > Hello Bill,
> > Sunday, December 03, 2000, 9:18:12 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > BB> Thanks for the tip. Looked good enough to sign up for an account.
> > BB> The numbers I saw gave postgesql a significant lead.
> >
> > So, my appeal for voting did it's job! Before I posted the mail,
> > mysql was leading at
> > 1200 to 450 (and 430 for interbase). Now it is 1461 for pgsql,
> > 1.254 for mysql
> > and 432 for interbase...
> >
> > I hope all of us will frequently take a look at
> http://www.mycgiserver.com so
> things won't get turned upside down again ;-)).
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bruno mailto:bruno(at)dickhoff(dot)de
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-12-04 01:20:51 Re: Re[2]: [Please vote for postgresql!!!]
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2000-12-03 23:07:43 Re: how to determine what a process is doing