From: | GH <grasshacker(at)over-yonder(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re[2]: [Please vote for postgresql!!!] |
Date: | 2000-12-03 23:40:24 |
Message-ID: | 20001203174024.A74174@over-yonder.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 04:14:48PM -0600, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> looks like it backfired...they've reset the graph
Sheesh! Apparently *everybody* wants a recount.
gh
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruno Dickhoff
> > Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 3:11 PM
> > To: Bill Barnes
> > Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re[2]: [[GENERAL] Please vote for postgresql!!!]
> >
> >
> > Hello Bill,
> > Sunday, December 03, 2000, 9:18:12 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > BB> Thanks for the tip. Looked good enough to sign up for an account.
> > BB> The numbers I saw gave postgesql a significant lead.
> >
> > So, my appeal for voting did it's job! Before I posted the mail,
> > mysql was leading at
> > 1200 to 450 (and 430 for interbase). Now it is 1461 for pgsql,
> > 1.254 for mysql
> > and 432 for interbase...
> >
> > I hope all of us will frequently take a look at
> http://www.mycgiserver.com so
> things won't get turned upside down again ;-)).
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bruno mailto:bruno(at)dickhoff(dot)de
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-12-04 01:20:51 | Re: Re[2]: [Please vote for postgresql!!!] |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-12-03 23:07:43 | Re: how to determine what a process is doing |