| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: location of Unix socket |
| Date: | 2000-11-27 21:06:50 |
| Message-ID: | 200011272106.QAA22218@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Am I handling this properly? I hate to be dragging around the unix
> > socket directory name in pghost for too long and hate to be propogating
> > the slash test throughout the code.
>
> It's probably cleanest to do that the way you are doing it. However,
> one could argue we should make PQhost() return
> pghost ? pghost : pgunixsocket
> which'd make the external behavior compatible with the way one specifies
> the connection.
>
> Basically, the idea was to *not* have a distinct unixsocket spec
> anywhere in libpq's external API, so that existing apps wouldn't need
> a rewrite to support this feature. Keeping unixsocket separate inside
> the library is a good idea, but it's independent of the API.
Done. New code:
return conn->pghost ? conn->pghost : conn->pgunixsocket;
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-27 21:09:46 | Re: Initdb not running on beos |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-27 21:04:28 | Re: location of Unix socket |