From: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Warning: Don't delete those /tmp/.PGSQL.* files |
Date: | 2000-11-25 22:40:43 |
Message-ID: | 20001125164043.A14467@lerami.lerctr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [001125 16:37]:
> "Joel Burton" <jburton(at)scw(dot)org> writes:
>
> This story does indicate that we need a less fragile interlock against
> starting two postmasters on one database. I have to admit that it
> hadn't occurred to me that you could break the port-number interlock
> so easily as that :-(. But obviously you can, so we need a different
> way of representing the interlock. Hackers, any thoughts?
how about a .pid/.port/.??? file in the /data directory, and a lock on that?
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | GH | 2000-11-25 23:03:27 | Re: Warning: Don't delete those /tmp/.PGSQL.* files |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-25 22:35:13 | Re: Warning: Don't delete those /tmp/.PGSQL.* files |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | GH | 2000-11-25 23:03:27 | Re: Warning: Don't delete those /tmp/.PGSQL.* files |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-25 22:35:13 | Re: Warning: Don't delete those /tmp/.PGSQL.* files |