From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Anders Bengtsson <anders(at)lecando(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: no meaningful way to determine fe or be version? |
Date: | 2000-11-17 17:20:17 |
Message-ID: | 200011171720.MAA25515@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-interfaces |
This concerns me. Did we lose a patch here? Can you send it again?
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > sorry, yes. the client-side interfaces (DatabaseMetaData.getDriver*)
> > > are actually fine - they return a major/minor version that have been
> > > getting manually updated (they're much more visible, being in
> > > org/postgresql/Driver.java). the server-side interfaces
> > > (DatabaseMetaData.getDatabase{Name,Version}) are the ones that aren't
> > > tied to the server, return hardcoded strings and haven't been getting
> > > updated regularly.
> >
> > Oh, really. I didn't know there was that distinction. Sounds like they
> > should be callling SELECT version(). Comments, Java folks?
>
> I posted a patch for the JDBC driver to pgsql-interfaces to do just that
> some time ago. Don't know what happened to it, though ..
>
> /Anders
> ________________________________________________________________________
> A n d e r s B e n g t s s o n anders(at)lecando(dot)com
> http://www.lecando.com
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anders Bengtsson | 2000-11-18 16:46:10 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: no meaningful way to determine fe or beversion? |
Previous Message | Anders Bengtsson | 2000-11-17 09:34:48 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: no meaningful way to determine fe or be version? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-11-17 20:09:03 | Re: ODBC Maintainer? |
Previous Message | Samuele Brignoli | 2000-11-17 17:09:39 | Good! |