From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Paul M(dot) Aoki" <aoki(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: no meaningful way to determine fe or be version? |
Date: | 2000-11-16 20:58:14 |
Message-ID: | 200011162058.PAA29730@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-interfaces |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Yes, should we return the client or server version from the interface?
> > If we return the server version, how does someone query the client version?
>
> sorry, yes. the client-side interfaces (DatabaseMetaData.getDriver*)
> are actually fine - they return a major/minor version that have been
> getting manually updated (they're much more visible, being in
> org/postgresql/Driver.java). the server-side interfaces
> (DatabaseMetaData.getDatabase{Name,Version}) are the ones that aren't
> tied to the server, return hardcoded strings and haven't been getting
> updated regularly.
Oh, really. I didn't know there was that distinction. Sounds like they
should be callling SELECT version(). Comments, Java folks?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2000-11-17 00:17:52 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: no meaningful way to determine fe or be version? |
Previous Message | Paul M. Aoki | 2000-11-16 20:52:43 | Re: no meaningful way to determine fe or be version? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Farley | 2000-11-16 21:09:10 | Re: JDBC prob. Continued |
Previous Message | Paul M. Aoki | 2000-11-16 20:52:43 | Re: no meaningful way to determine fe or be version? |