* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> [001116 14:02]:
> > > This sounds like an interesting approach, yes.
> > Question: Is sleep(0) guaranteed to at least give up control?
> >
> > The way I read my UnixWare 7's man page, it might not, since alarm(0)
> > just cancels the alarm...
>
> Well, it certainly is a kernel call, and most OS's re-evaluate on kernel
> call return.
BUT, do we know for sure that sleep(0) is not optimized in the library
to just return?
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749