| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "'Marko Kreen'" <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh |
| Date: | 2000-11-16 04:42:05 |
| Message-ID: | 200011160442.XAA24753@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> To answer another misconception that I saw in this thread:
>
> : The old language names "internal" and "C" will continue to refer to
> : functions with the old calling convention. We should deprecate
> : old-style functions because of their portability problems, but the
> : support for them will only be one small function handler routine,
> : so we can leave them in place for as long as necessary.
My question is can we drop newC and use just plain C in 7.2 or 7.3?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-11-16 04:49:47 | Re: SearchSysCacheTuple(Copy) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-16 04:38:47 | Re: int4 or int32 |