| From: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hossein S(dot) Zadeh" <hossein(at)hossein(dot)bf(dot)rmit(dot)edu(dot)au> |
| Cc: | admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Losing data from Postgres |
| Date: | 2000-11-16 06:33:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20001115223324.X830@fw.wintelcom.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
* Hossein S. Zadeh <hossein(at)hossein(dot)bf(dot)rmit(dot)edu(dot)au> [001115 22:26] wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > * Serge Canizares <serge(at)ephilosopher(dot)com> [001115 08:23] wrote:
> > >
> > > Of course, if someone sees a reason that RAID 5 would be better than RAID 1+0,
> > > I'd appreciate an explanation!
> >
> > Cost. :)
> >
>
> A little bit more explanation: :-)
>
> RAID 1+0 gives you only half of the installed space but gives you (n/2)
> times speed of individual disks. For example for 4 hard disks 1G each, you
> get only 2G of space but double the speed of individual disks.
The problem with mirroring is potentially saturating the bus much
earlier than RAID 5 because of doubling of writes that much occur.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc Poinot | 2000-11-16 08:17:43 | Re: Newbie: pg_hba.conf question |
| Previous Message | Hossein S. Zadeh | 2000-11-16 06:17:19 | Re: Losing data from Postgres |