Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1

From: selkovjr(at)mcs(dot)anl(dot)gov
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Date: 2000-11-11 05:09:15
Message-ID: 200011110509.XAA19353@selkovjr.xnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Hollomon wrote:

> Correct. I don't know why anyone would want to change the definition of
> (say) int48eq, but if we are going to allow them to do so, we should be
> careful to allow them to backup and restore such a change.

Yes, and it is also important that if such weirdos exist, they are
allowed to backup this type of change separately from the databases.

--Gene

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-11-11 08:07:12 Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-11-11 04:26:11 Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1