Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR
Date: 2000-11-03 20:45:11
Message-ID: 20001103144511.A23852@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> [001028 02:23]:
> I don't think we need this ASAP for 7.1. Let's get the basic stuff
> working from a "least surprise" standpoint, and see what the user base
> comes up with. I really think your proposal from earlier tonite is
> the way to go, at least from my perspective.
>
> Thanks again.
What was the final outcome? Will Tom's proposal make 7.1?

(Do I need to learn how to code backend stuff?)

LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lance Taylor 2000-11-03 20:48:07 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0.3 branded
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-03 20:34:44 Re: Re[2]: postgres not use table access permissions ?