| From: | Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | DaVinci <bombadil(at)wanadoo(dot)es>, Lista PostgreSql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OID and joins |
| Date: | 2000-10-18 18:43:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20001018114352.A9881@ricochet.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 06:18:07PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > - Any other limitation I don't achieve to view?.
>
> Nope, this is really a relatively standard thing. The oid column isn't
> special as compared to other columns, aside from the fact that it is
> automatically created.
...and isn't preserved in backups by default, causes problems while
seleting from one table into another for purposes of removing a column,
and isn't preserved during cluster generation...
...oh yeah, and it isn't standard, so it'l make it hard to migrate to a
different database system should you need to do that for some reason...
--
Adam Haberlach | ASCII /~\
adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com | Ribbon \ / Against
http://www.newsnipple.com | Campaign X HTML
'88 EX500 | / \ E-mail
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A farmer using BSD, eh! | 2000-10-18 18:50:08 | Re: 7.1 Release Date |
| Previous Message | Travis Bauer | 2000-10-18 18:28:37 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_connect error |