Re: storing binary data

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: storing binary data
Date: 2000-10-17 03:56:33
Message-ID: 20001016205633.L272@fw.wintelcom.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

* Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> [001016 20:41] wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 11:22:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> > > I want to store some binary data in Postgres. The data is an
> > > MD5 checksum of the user's password, in binary. It will be
> > > exactly 16 bytes (since it is a one-way hash).
> >
> > > Can I store this safely in a CHAR column?
> >
> > No. CHAR and friends assume there are no null (zero) bytes.
> > In MULTIBYTE setups there are probably additional constraints.
> >
> > You could use bytea, but I would recommend converting the checksum
> > to a hex digit string and then storing that in a char-type field.
> > Hex is the usual textual representation for MD5 values, no?
>
> It is, but (IMHO) it's a big waste of space. The actual MD5 digest is
> 128 bits. If stored in binary form, it's 16 bytes. If stored in hex
> form (as ASCII), it's 32 characters @ 1 byte per character = 32 bytes.
> In Unicode, that's 64 bytes (correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> It's not a huge deal, but it would be nice to store this efficiently.
> Is this possible?

Why not use base64? It's pretty gross but might work for you.

-Alfred

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-17 03:57:36 Re: storing binary data
Previous Message Neil Conway 2000-10-17 03:40:09 Re: storing binary data