Re: Isn't non-TEST_AND_SET code long dead?

> Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
> > On a somewhat related note, what about the NO_SECURITY defines
> > strewn throughout the backend? Does anyone run the server with
> > NO_SECURITY defined? And if so, what benefit is that over just
> > running with everything owned by the same user?
>
> I suppose the idea was to avoid expending *any* cycles on security
> checks if you didn't need them in your particular situation. But
> offhand I've never heard of anyone actually using the feature. I'm
> dubious whether the amount of time saved would be worth the trouble.

NO_SECURITY define removed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026