Re: Core dump

From: Dan Moschuk <dan(at)freebsd(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dan Moschuk <dan(at)freebsd(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core dump
Date: 2000-10-12 23:13:41
Message-ID: 20001012191341.B3861@spirit.jaded.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


| I said:
| > BlockSig includes SIGUSR1.
|
| Oh, wait, I take that back. It's initialized that way, but then
| postmaster.c removes SIGUSR1 from the set.
|
| regards, tom lane

So, back to my initial question, why not make each postmaster SIG_IGN
SIGUSR1 after it receives one?

-Dan
--
Man is a rational animal who always loses his temper when he is called
upon to act in accordance with the dictates of reason.
-- Oscar Wilde

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-10-12 23:27:48 RE: [HACKERS] Re: postgresql 7.1
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-10-12 23:06:16 Re: AW: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN