Re: [HACKERS] My new job

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Date: 2000-10-10 16:55:55
Message-ID: 200010101655.MAA23128@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > After careful consideration, I have decided to accept a job with Great
> > Bridge.
>
> Whatever happened to this:
>
> Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 15:19:48 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Ross J. Reedstrom <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>
> Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Steering committee responce to Great Bridge LLC
>
> : One thing we have agreed to is that there must not be an unseemly fraction
> : of core members working for the same company. With six people on core,
> : probably about two working at the same company would be a reasonable
> : limit.

Excellent question. I suggested leaving core, but that would still mean
more than 1/3 of core people would be in one company. Our short-term
solution is to keep going until we see some problems. Our long-term
strategy is to increase the size of the core group.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-10-10 16:59:18 Re: Re: JDBC Performance
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2000-10-10 16:47:15 Re: Listing Triggers corresponding to foreign keys

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-10 17:02:52 Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-10-10 16:49:16 Re: CVS broken?