From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | ally(at)netscape(dot)net(dot)au |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 7.1 and the 8k tuple / row limit |
Date: | 2000-10-10 03:25:31 |
Message-ID: | 20001009232531.A2408@klamath.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 01:17:45PM +1000, Ally wrote:
> I've developed a full-text, news article database in Postgres with Perl and
> the Pg module as my search front end. The only problem (that I discovered
> AFTER I'd done all my dev work) is that Postgres has an 8K row limit. About
> 3% of my articles exceed this size limit.
>
> However, I've read that Postgres 7.1 / 7.2 will accomodate larger row sizes
> and was wondering if there was a ballpark ETA / release date for them. And
> does anybody know which version will have this feature?
It will be in 7.1, which introduces TOAST (basically, support for
long tuples). It's also in the current CVS sources. I really have no
idea when the official release date is, but I'm guessing a beta
sometime in October, and a release in November? But that's a guess
from a PgSQL user, not developer - I'd recommend waiting for a
developer to get back to you.
IMHO, you have 2 choices. Use Large Objects, or wait for TOAST. I'm
writing a similar application to yours, and I've decided to use
TOAST and do my development on a pre-7.1 snapshot copy. It's very
stable (for a development snapshot - I haven't been running it in
production), and a number of annoying bugs have been fixed. I haven't
had any problems at all.
HTH,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)home(dot)com>
Get my GnuPG key from: http://klamath.dyndns.org/mykey.asc
Encrypted mail welcomed
I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right
to say it.
-- Voltaire
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bmccoy | 2000-10-10 03:29:56 | Re: Re: VIEW problem |
Previous Message | Keith L. Musser | 2000-10-10 03:14:48 | Re: Re: JDBC Performance |